Depth to Water Table and Depth To Water Level in Wells
Author: Steve Custer
Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT
59717-3480
Compiled by Matt Trebesch, David Moody, Stewart Dixon
and Steve Custer
from data in
Hackett, et al. (1960), Dunn (1977) and the Ground-Water
Information Center
Last modified 7 June 2000
Back to Septic Assessment Home...
Example Questions the Database Can Answer
-
What is the depth to the water table in the area in 1977?
-
What is the depth to the water table in the area in 1953?
-
What is the expected depth to water in water wells in the
area based on other wells drilled near by?
-
Where does depth to water suggest flowing artesian wells?
Additional depth to water table can be obtained for analysis
of soil data as well.
This map contains four themes:
1. 1977 Water Table Depth
2. 1953 Water Table Depth
3. Water Level in Wells on the Date Drilled
4. Flowing Artesian Wells (Wells with water level above ground
surface.)
The first two depict areas where Hackett et al. (1960) and Dunn,
(1977) report water table within 10 feet of ground surface. These maps
do not cover the whole Local Water Quality District (LWQD).
No absolute water levels are provided. The map of water level in
wells on the date drilled simply reports the water level the driller found
when the well was drilled. As a result, the water levels reported
may not be the shallowest that occurs. Areas of high water level
(close to the surface) may reflect high water table or high ground-water
pressure. Which is the case can only be determined by site-specific
investigation. The last map depicts areas where water levels are
reported above ground surface (negative depth to water in the well). Soil
data on depth to water table (Restrictive Feature called Wetness) may
also be helpful given the ambiguity of the water-level data in wells which
arises from the difference between water level and water table (see below)
the variable data of measurement of water wells, and the age of the depth-to-water
maps.
Interactive Map 1: Depth to Water Table and Water Level in Wells from Drill Log (Note: maps and data will take
longer to download)
Glossary
There is a difference between the concept of water
table and water-level in wells.
The water table is the location beneath the ground where water saturated
rock or sediment is first encountered AND
which is linked to the atmosphere through pores as opposed to being isolated
from the atmosphere by a confining unit such as a clay layer. Depth
to water in a well used for drinking water or stock water or irrigation
is likely NOT the water table. For ground-water
wells, there is often a pressure component that raises the water level
above the bottom of the casing. This level may or may not reflect
the water table. An extreme example of this issue is the flowing
artesian well. In a flowing artesian well the ground water actually
has sufficient pressure to rise above the ground surface and flow onto
the ground. The water level in the well in this case cannot reflect
the water table, for if it did the area would be under water. Similarly,
there may be pressure in the well which does not take the water level above
ground surface, but raises the water level in the well above the water
table none the less. The reverse can also occur where the ground-water-flow
system is recharging and the pressures may actually be lower and water
levels may be below the water table. As a result, the water level
in a well not completed to the first saturated sediment but drilled to
obtain sustainable water for drinking may not be representative of the
water table. The maps of depth to water by Hackett et al. (1960)
and Dunn (1977) can be considered water table depths because many of the
wells monitored were hand driven well points. On the other hand,
maps by Slagle et al. (1995) and presented in the ground water gradient
grids may be representative of a mixture of water table and ground-water
level. In all cases where very shallow ground water is suspected
and home or septic system installation is contemplated, shallow wells
should be drilled to the first saturated zone, and the water levels should
be monitored during a period when the highest water levels are expected
(commonly July-August in the irrigated valley). Such monitoring will
help determine what if any special drains or septic system installation
strategies are required. Indeed the water table may be sufficiently
high that alternative construction sites should be considered.
About the Data
Wtdepth53.shp Metadata
Wtdepth77.shp Metadata
The 1953 and 1977 water table maps and depth to the ground-water table
were digitized from Hackett et al., 1960 and from Dunn, 1977 at an original
map scale of 1:126720 in polyconic projection. The depth to water-table
maps are generalized in the original publication to show depth to water
more than 10 feet or less than 10 feet). The Hackett et al.
(1960) and Dunn (1977) maps were digitized from maps in polyconic projection
and the data was reprojected to UTM Zone 12 NAD83. The settings for
polyconic conversion in Arc/Info were: Central Meridian: 111 degrees
00 minutes 00 seconds; Latitude of Projection Origin: 45 degrees,
22 minutes, 30 seconds; False Easting: 0; False Northing: 0.
The Slagle (1995) map was digitized from UTM Zone 12 NAD 27 and reprojected
to UTM Zone 12 NAD83. The water level maps were created from
data in the Ground Water Information Center (GWIC).
This data represents the water level in wells on the date drilled.
Not all wells were allowed into the data base. Wells were located
based upon address and subdivision block and lot data. The locations
of the wells were marked on a Gallatin County road book published in 1995
which shows structures as dots. If the address or subdivision Block
and lot matched the road book, the dot was entered and a M-Number
(GWIC identification number) was noted. This data was digitized from
the road book by coordinating to the section corners and entering a code.
Later information from the GWIC system
was added to the coverage by linking on the M-Number. Where more
than one well existed at a site, additional wells were "spawned" 5 m from
the original well so each well was unique. The map of water level
in the well and of flowing artesian wells uses depth to water information
from GWIC available for wells that were located. Well location is
estimated to be within 100 m of the correct location based on the generalization
that lots are typically 1 acre in size.
References Cited
Dunn, D.E., 1977, Ground-water levels and ground water chemistry, Gallatin
Valley Montana, Blue Ribbons of the Big Sky Areawide Planning Organization
report, #11, 62 p.
Hackett, O.M., Visher, F.N., McMurtrey, R.G., and Steinhulber, W.L.,
1960, Geology and ground water resources of the Gallatin Valley, Gallatin
County, Montana: U.S. Geological survey Water Supply Paper 1482, 282 p.
Slagle, S.E., 1995, Geohydrologic conditions and land use in the Gallatin
Valley, South Western Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations
Report 95-4030.